Sunday, November 17, 2013

Shia Sunni Conflict

After the death of Prophet Mohammed in 632AD, Islamic world got divided in the question of Prophet Mohammed’s successor as the caliph of whole Islamic community. This was the start of long conflict in the Islamic community, which we now understand as Shia- Sunni conflict. Shia are the minority Muslim population comprising an approximation of 10 to 20 percent of total Islamic population with their majority population in Iran, Azerbaijan, Iraq and Bahrain, while Sunnis are the majority Islamic population with majority population in all other Muslim countries.

Modern Shia-Sunni conflicts holds much of the importance in politics of Middle East and also in the politics of many western countries ,which is one way or other associated to Middle East. The Iranian Islamic revolution changed the calculus of Shia- Sunni power equation in Muslim countries with overthrowing of the rule of Shah Mohammad Pahlavi supported by the United States and United Kingdom, by Shia leader Ayatollah Khomeini; thus arousing the traditionally subservient Shia to the alarm of traditionally dominant Sunnis. Shia dominated Iran was in favor of Shia- Sunni harmony, but their contentious relation with Saudi Arabia divided Arab countries into two different front. Countries like Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan went through a new wave of revolution following this Islamic revival. American military intervention in Iraq also fueled Shia- Sunni conflict to new height.
Iraq was dominantly ruled by Sunni people under the leadership of Saddam Hussein until 2003, under which period some 50,000 to 100,000 Shia were mercilessly persecuted. After an intervention from USA in 2003, Shia majority have handled the administrative position in Iraq which previously used to be hold by Sunni. The violent Sunni-Shia conflict took a new turn with Sunni majority killing Shia population by suicide bombings, and Shia majority through death squad, a practice of extrajudicial killings and forced disappearance for political reasons to keep the secrecy of killed and to avoid the accountability.

Al-Qaeda, terrorist group against any anti-Sunni Islamic principal, is also responsible for provoking sectarian violence among Muslims. Al-Qaeda has carried out many attacks on non-Sunni Muslims and  non-Muslims; 9/11 attacks,  Yazidi community bombings, the Sadr City bombings, the Ashoura Massacre and the April 2007 Baghdad bombings are some of the examples of attacks. Taliban, another Islamic terrorist group, has also been instigating the sectarian conflict between Sunni Pashtun and Shia population in Afghanistan after Soviet Union’s withdrawal in 1989. Similarly, recent Syrian uprising has reawakened the sectarian tensions in Syria, which now is turning into a sectarian strife between the Alawits and Sunni Jihadists.
In countries like Syria, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan, sectarian conflict is pervaded primarily by an effort to change the political system in the country- this sectarian conflict has not come by itself. When Iran tried to transform itself into republic state, it brought about the sectarian conflict all over the world that has influence up to today’s world. When USA tried to bring democracy in Iraq by out-casting the Sunni minority led by Saddam Hussain, it brought about a political havoc not only in Iraq but also in USA, whose aftermaths  of involvemnet still has influence in downturn of American Economic to this date. Similarly, when Soviet Union in one end of the spectrum and USA and Saudi Arabia on the other tried to solve political fiasco in Afghanistan, it brought about the sectarian problem with Taliban and Al-Qaeda, the greatest threat of Western world. Contemporary Syrian crisis is another vivid example where an effort to change political system has backfired the struggle into a sectarian conflict. It is safe to assume that whenever Middle East nations have tried to transform their fundamental political system, it have always created a problem with Sectarian issue.
If world wants stable, non-extremist and democratic Middle East, it needs to settle sectarian conflict before it wants middle east countries to walk along the road of democracy- the political change these countries are trying to embrace. Trying to change the political system without ousting the probability of sectarian conflict will always create troubles in world.

No comments:

Post a Comment